LiDAR-only scan-to-model odometry that registers observability-sampled points to an implicit moving least squares surface built from the last n localized sweeps, with constant-velocity de-skewing and size-based small-object removal; no loop closure and not real time.

技術屬性

欄位內容為文獻擷取紀錄的原文用語(英文),以原文為據;「未查證」表示本研究尚未讀到該資訊,不代表該方法不具備此能力。

IMLS-SLAM 的技術屬性
感測輸入3D spinning LiDAR only (Velodyne HDL32 and HDL64 in the experiments); no IMU, GPS or camera
原文測試平台vehicle
狀態估計iterative scan-to-model registration: each selected sample is projected onto the IMLS surface, then the rigid transform is found by linearized point-to-plane least squares under a small-angle assumption; fixed 20 iterations per scan (Sec. V; Sec. VI)
資料關聯closest point in the model cloud (FLANN k-d tree) within radius r = 0.20 m; samples chosen from nine lists ranked by their contribution to observability of roll, pitch, yaw and the three translations (planarity-weighted), s = 100 per list (Sec. IV; Sec. VI)
時間表示one discrete pose per sweep end; poses inside a sweep linearly interpolated between the previous and current end pose, current pose predicted by constant relative motion (Sec. III)
去畸變linear interpolation between the previous end pose and the predicted end pose before matching, recomputed with the final pose after matching (Sec. III; Sec. V); not applied on KITTI, whose scans are already de-skewed (Sec. VI.B)
迴圈閉合none (drift reported without any loop closure)
全域最佳化none
地圖表示point cloud of the last n = 100 localized scans with normals, used as an implicit moving least squares (IMLS) surface (h = 0.06 m); the oldest scan is dropped as a new one is added and the k-d tree is rebuilt per scan (Sec. V; Sec. VI.C)
先驗資訊none
可輸出幾何trajectory and accumulated de-skewed point cloud (Figs. 4-6)
計算需求C++ with FLANN and Eigen on one CPU core at 4 GHz, less than 1 GB RAM; not real time: 1.25 s per scan on KITTI (0.2 s normals, 1 s k-d tree, 0.05 s matching) (Sec. VI; Sec. VI.C)

使用設備

原文使用的感測器、運算硬體與載具(equipment)。型號保留原文寫法,連結到設備頁中同一型號的歸併名稱;角色依原文用途分為方法輸入、資料集感測器、執行運算平台、參考或真值量測(reference or ground truth)與比較對象設備。

原文使用的設備
類別型號(原文寫法)角色資料集原文規格出處
LiDARVelodyne HDL32歸入:Velodyne HDL-32E方法輸入未標示32 laser beams, spinning at 10 Hz (100 ms per scan); mounted vertically on a car roof (Paris, 12951 scans) and tilted 60 degrees in pitch (Lille, 1500 scans)(Deschaud, 2018, Sec. VI; Sec. VI-A)
LiDARVelodyne HDL64歸入:Velodyne HDL-64E資料集感測器KITTI odometryvertical, on the roof of a car, 64 beams, 10 Hz; scans provided de-skewed(Deschaud, 2018, Sec. VI; Sec. VI-B)
GNSS 接收器GPS+IMU navigation system (model not reported)參考或真值量測KITTI odometryground truth for 11 training sequences; author notes errors above 5 m at the start of sequence 8(Deschaud, 2018, Sec. VI-B)
載具平台car (vehicle roof mount, model not reported)方法輸入未標示vehicle driven through Paris (two 2 km loops) and a square in Lille(Deschaud, 2018, Sec. VI-A; Fig. 1)
運算硬體single CPU core at 4 GHz (processor model not reported)執行運算平台未標示one core, less than 1 GB RAM(Deschaud, 2018, Sec. VI)

作者報告的優勢與限制

優勢

限制

營建工程相關證據

未在營建場域驗證;實驗為巴黎與里爾的市區車載資料以及 KITTI。其掃描對隱式曲面模型的配準,以及以尺寸門檻剔除小物體的做法,和工地中機具、人員造成的點雲污染問題相關;但以尺寸刪除物體也可能刪去工地上小型而靜態的構件(推論)。後續 LiDAR 里程計論文常以它作為 KITTI 比較基準,例如 KISS-ICP、CT-ICP、MULLS、SuMa++、GenZ-ICP 與 MOLA-LO 的比較表(Vizzo et al., 2023)(Dellenbach et al., 2022)(Pan et al., 2021)(Chen et al., 2019)(Lee et al., 2025a)(Blanco-Claraco, 2025)。

原文驗證環境:公開基準、受控實驗

報告的性能數據

以下是原文作者報告的性能數值(author-reported results),不是本研究重新量測的結果。每張圖只並列同一個比較組(comparison group,同一張表、同一組實驗設定)內的方法;不同比較組之間的數值不可直接比較,也不構成排名。

本方法共出現在 8 個比較組,合計 33 筆紀錄。以下列出本方法紀錄最多的 4 組,其餘 4 組列在最後,並連到性能比較頁。

Deschaud, 2018 · Table I 本方法 11 筆

指標drift (%)

表格設定(擷取紀錄原文):KITTI odometry training sequences 00-10, HDL64; translation drift (%) with the KITTI metric; LOAM values copied from the LOAM Autonomous Robots paper [7] (Deschaud, 2018, Table I)

drift (%),KITTI odometry · 00

只並列這張表在相同設定下報告的方法;以「本方法:」開頭者為本頁方法。失敗、未執行與未報告以標記呈現,不是 0。

按 Tab 進入圖表後,用上下方向鍵逐一瀏覽各類別,Esc 關閉提示框;也可開啟表格檢視閱讀全部數值。

這些是 Deschaud, 2018 在此表設定下報告的數值(author-reported results),只能在同一個比較組內對照,不代表方法在其他資料或設定下的表現。

統計量:平均值(mean);對齊方式:原文未報告;單位:%;場景:Urban

資料來源作者報告值(Deschaud, 2018, Table I)

數值與出處
方法(原文寫法)報告值出處
LOAM [7] (results taken from paper)0.78%(Deschaud, 2018, Table I)
Our SLAM (IMLS-SLAM)本方法原文提出0.5%(Deschaud, 2018, Table I)

Deschaud, 2018 · Table IV 本方法 4 筆

指標Drift on KITTI training dataset

資料集與序列KITTI odometry · training 00-10 (overall)

表格設定(擷取紀錄原文):Ablation of number of scans n kept in the model; drift on the whole KITTI training dataset (Deschaud, 2018, Table IV)

Drift on KITTI training dataset,KITTI odometry · training 00-10 (overall)

只並列這張表在相同設定下報告的方法;以「本方法:」開頭者為本頁方法。失敗、未執行與未報告以標記呈現,不是 0。

按 Tab 進入圖表後,用上下方向鍵逐一瀏覽各類別,Esc 關閉提示框;也可開啟表格檢視閱讀全部數值。

這些是 Deschaud, 2018 在此表設定下報告的數值(author-reported results),只能在同一個比較組內對照,不代表方法在其他資料或設定下的表現。

統計量:平均值(mean);對齊方式:原文未報告;單位:%;場景:vehicle, mixed

資料來源作者報告值(Deschaud, 2018, Table IV)

數值與出處
方法(原文寫法)報告值出處
IMLS-SLAM, n = 1 scan本方法原文提出1.41%(Deschaud, 2018, Table IV)
IMLS-SLAM, n = 5 scans本方法原文提出0.58%(Deschaud, 2018, Table IV)
IMLS-SLAM, n = 10 scans本方法原文提出0.56%(Deschaud, 2018, Table IV)
IMLS-SLAM, n = 100 scans本方法原文提出0.55%(Deschaud, 2018, Table IV)

Deschaud, 2018 · Text Sec. VI-B 本方法 4 筆

表格設定(擷取紀錄原文):KITTI odometry, overall values stated in text (training set with ground truth; test set from KITTI website) (Deschaud, 2018, Text Sec. VI-B)

drift in translation,KITTI odometry · training 00-10 (overall)

這張表在此指標與資料序列只列出本方法一筆,沒有可並列的其他方法,因此不畫圖,數值與出處見下表。這是 Deschaud, 2018 在此表設定下報告的數值(author-reported results),不代表方法在其他資料或設定下的表現。

統計量:平均值(mean);對齊方式:原文未報告;單位:%;場景:vehicle, mixed

數值與出處
方法(原文寫法)報告值出處
IMLS-SLAM本方法原文提出0.55%(Deschaud, 2018, Sec. VI-B)

Deschaud, 2018 · Text Sec. VI-C 本方法 4 筆

資料集與序列KITTI odometry · all

表格設定(擷取紀錄原文):Processing time per scan on KITTI (normals from 3D points since raw range images are unavailable) (Deschaud, 2018, Text Sec. VI-C)

total time per scan,KITTI odometry · all

這張表在此指標與資料序列只列出本方法一筆,沒有可並列的其他方法,因此不畫圖,數值與出處見下表。這是 Deschaud, 2018 在此表設定下報告的數值(author-reported results),不代表方法在其他資料或設定下的表現。

統計量:原文未報告;對齊方式:不適用;單位:s;場景:vehicle

數值與出處
方法(原文寫法)報告值出處
IMLS SLAM本方法原文提出硬體:one CPU core at 4 GHz, less than 1 GB RAM1.25 s(Deschaud, 2018, Sec. VI-C)

其他比較組

列出其餘 4 個比較組

來源

  • Deschaud, 2018

    Jean-Emmanuel Deschaud(2018)IMLS-SLAM: Scan-to-Model Matching Based on 3D Data2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia, pp. 2480-2485

    同儕審查已出版已讀全文近十年

回到方法圖鑑

選擇開啟Esc關閉