LiDAR-only scan-to-map ICP SLAM for the Velodyne HDL-64E with two-pass linear de-skewing and normal-guided measurement adaptation in a surface-grid map, plus offline map refinement; no loop closure.

技術屬性

欄位內容為文獻擷取紀錄的原文用語(英文),以原文為據;「未查證」表示本研究尚未讀到該資訊,不代表該方法不具備此能力。

Velodyne SLAM 的技術屬性
感測輸入3D spinning LiDAR only (Velodyne HDL-64E S2); no wheel-speed, inertial or other information
原文測試平台vehicle (experimental vehicle AnnieWay)
狀態估計scan-to-map ICP minimizing point-to-plane distances (Chen-Medioni) with nearest neighbours searched in 6D (position and normal), initialized by constant-motion prediction; 1000 surfaces sampled from the upper and 500 from the lower half of the range image (Sec. II.C)
資料關聯6D nearest neighbour (px, py, pz, nx, ny, nz) between scan surfaces and map surfaces (Sec. II.C)
時間表示one pose at the end of each 360 deg turn; poses within a turn linearly interpolated assuming constant velocity (Sec. II.C)
去畸變linear-interpolation de-skewing applied twice, before ICP with the predicted pose and after ICP with the final pose (Sec. II.D)
迴圈閉合none (named as future work)
全域最佳化none
地圖表示3D grid of resolution g (5 cm default) holding at most one surface (point, normal, normal confidence) per cell; in flat regions new measurements are moved along their normals to fit neighbouring surfaces before insertion; cells are replaced by closer or more confident measurements and never erased (Sec. II.E)
先驗資訊none
可輸出幾何vehicle trajectory and a detailed 3D point cloud of surfaces; an offline refinement builds a new map from the stored original measurements (Sec. II.F)
計算需求原文未報告 (the authors state that a low grid value gives precise maps and a higher value faster on-line processing)

使用設備

原文使用的感測器、運算硬體與載具(equipment)。型號保留原文寫法,連結到設備頁中同一型號的歸併名稱;角色依原文用途分為方法輸入、資料集感測器、執行運算平台、參考或真值量測(reference or ground truth)與比較對象設備。

原文使用的設備
類別型號(原文寫法)角色資料集原文規格出處
LiDARVelodyne HDL-64E S2歸入:Velodyne HDL-64E方法輸入Velodyne SLAM dataset (AnnieWay, two scenarios)64 laser diodes over about 26 deg pitch, continuous 360 deg rotation at about 10 Hz; each turn arranged as an 870 x 64 range image; relatively high measurement noise(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Sec. I; Sec. II-A; Sec. II-D)
GNSS 接收器integrated navigation system (INS) fusing GPS, wheel speed sensors and inertial measurements (model not reported)比較對象設備Velodyne SLAM dataset (AnnieWay, two scenarios)local errors higher than those of the proposed method; not usable as ground truth(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Sec. III; Table I)
載具平台experimental vehicle AnnieWay方法輸入Velodyne SLAM dataset (AnnieWay, two scenarios)scanner mounted on top of the vehicle; scenario 1 about 1.3 km and scenario 2 about 1.1 km, both with a bridge(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Sec. I; Sec. III; Fig. 4)

作者報告的優勢與限制

優勢

限制

營建工程相關證據

論文未在施工或建築環境測試,只在兩段含橋樑的戶外多層車載路線上評估。它把量測點沿法向量移動以壓低平面厚度,並提供離線地圖精修,目標是可作城市模型的細緻點雲;這種降低平面雜訊的做法與施工點雲的平面厚度問題相關,但論文只以目視檢查地圖品質,屬推論。

原文驗證環境:受控實驗

報告的性能數據

以下是原文作者報告的性能數值(author-reported results),不是本研究重新量測的結果。每張圖只並列同一個比較組(comparison group,同一張表、同一組實驗設定)內的方法;不同比較組之間的數值不可直接比較,也不構成排名。

本方法共出現在 1 個比較組,合計 16 筆紀錄。

Moosmann & Stiller, 2011 · Table I 本方法 16 筆

指標End-point error

表格設定(擷取紀錄原文):End-point error (Euclidean distance between estimated end position and the end position obtained by ICP of the last scan to the first scan) on two loop scenarios; no loop closure; map parts beyond 50 m discarded; g = 5 cm (Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)

End-point error,Velodyne SLAM dataset (AnnieWay) · Scenario 1 (1.3 km)

只並列這張表在相同設定下報告的方法;以「本方法:」開頭者為本頁方法。失敗、未執行與未報告以標記呈現,不是 0。

按 Tab 進入圖表後,用上下方向鍵逐一瀏覽各類別,Esc 關閉提示框;也可開啟表格檢視閱讀全部數值。

這些是 Moosmann & Stiller, 2011 在此表設定下報告的數值(author-reported results),只能在同一個比較組內對照,不代表方法在其他資料或設定下的表現。

統計量:原文未報告;對齊方式:未對齊;單位:m;場景:outdoor multilayer scene with a bridge (vehicle)

資料來源作者報告值(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)

數值與出處
方法(原文寫法)報告值出處
IMU (integrated navigation system: GPS, wheel speed, inertial)3.3 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)
Setting 1 (mapping no, de-skewing no, adaptation no)本方法原文提出19.6 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)
Setting 2 (mapping no, de-skewing no, adaptation yes)本方法原文提出19.33 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)
Setting 3 (mapping no, de-skewing yes, adaptation no)本方法原文提出27.41 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)
Setting 4 (mapping no, de-skewing yes, adaptation yes)本方法原文提出27.21 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)
Setting 5 (mapping yes, de-skewing no, adaptation no)本方法原文提出4.47 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)
Setting 6 (mapping yes, de-skewing no, adaptation yes)本方法原文提出4.13 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)
Setting 7 (mapping yes, de-skewing yes, adaptation no)本方法原文提出2.9 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)
Setting 8 (mapping yes, de-skewing yes, adaptation yes)本方法原文提出2.29 m(Moosmann & Stiller, 2011, Table I)

來源

  • Moosmann & Stiller, 2011

    Frank Moosmann, Christoph Stiller(2011)Velodyne SLAM2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Baden-Baden, Germany, pp. 393-398

    同儕審查已出版已讀全文經典

回到方法圖鑑

選擇開啟Esc關閉